HomeMy WebLinkAboutC.054.93010_0229 (2)Prospect Road. The existing/surrounding land use is residential, bona -fide farm, and vacant. Hobbs
said the staff recommended approval due to the high percentage in support of the residential zoning
reclassi fication. On August 2, 2000, the planning board unanimously recommended approval in an
8-0 vote.
Commissioner Johnson said he understood that vested rights were of no concern in the
rezoning case.
Hobbs said that was correct.
W.D. ("Doug_') Campbell said he was against the rezoning. Mr. Campbell said he and his
wife owned four parcels of land covering 100 acres. He said the individuals petitioning for the
rezoning seemed to believe his wife planned to place a mobile home park in an area recently
cleared of timber. Campbell said his wife never had this intention. He did mention, however, that
one "trailer" might be placed on the property for a disabled grandson.
Mr. Hobbs explained that single -wide mobile homes for relatives were allowed in RU -R
zoning. He said there was a condition, however, that single -wider needed to he on the same tract
of land as the property owner's residence.
Tom Hamer said he owned property in the designated area, and he supported the request.
Mr. Harper said he was the community spokesman, and when he asked the audience members to
stand if they supported the rezoning, about 15-20 people stood up.
Jeannie Gaither said she supported the rezoning. Mrs. Gaither said she and her husband had
built a home in the area, and they were concerned about crime that might occur from occupants of
mobile -home rentals.
Hobbs added that two property owners had requested removal from the rezoning. He said
that since their properties were located near the border of the request, they had been removed and
left at the RA zoning.
Chairman Tice adjourned the public hearing.
MOTION by Commissioner Fortner to rezone the property in Case #0008-3 from RA,
Residential Agricultural to RU -R, Rural Residential District.
VOTING: Ayes - 4; Nays - 0.
Chairman Tice declared the meeting to be in public hearing session. (Due to the next case
involving conditional uses, the individuals desiring to speak were sworn in.)
REZONING REQUEST; J.C. FAW PROPERTY, CASE NO. 0008-4, FROM R-20, SINGLE-
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO GB (CUD), GENERAL BUSINESS CONDITIONAL. USE DISTRICT
(Located off Turnersburg Highway/US 21 at Interstate 77): Hobbs said the owner (J.C. Faw)
desired to rezone properties from R-20, Single Family Residential to GB, General Business District,
Conditional Use District. He said the conditional use was the Roadway Protection Overlay District
requirements (Section 6.18, page 25 of the Zoning Ordinance). Mr. Hobbs said the proposed usage
for the site was a motel, restaurants, auto accessory and all other general business uses. He said the
properties involved 22 acres and could be identified by PIN#4746-88-5198; 4746-87-6475; 4746-87-
2662; 4746-77-7443, and 4746-77-9629. The existing land use is vacant and residential. The
surrounding land use is real estate sales office, churches, gas station, vacant, and residential. Mr.
Hobbs said the properties represented the majority of the southwestern quadrant of the intersection
U S 21 and 1-77 and were designated as future commerciallbusiness zonings on the county land
_.; pkan Fie said the staff supported the request and conditional use. On August 2, 2000, the
,,ann:..-;8 board unanimously recommended approval in an 8-0 vote.