Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutC.054.93008_1229 (2)782 protecting residents. 10. Residents have limited optional access. 11. Traffic congestion/danger 12. Existing drainage/runoff problem. 13. Ground water/well pollution danger. 14. Inadequate fire & police protection. 15. Quality of life and wildlife threatened. They requested the board to do one of the following: 1. Reject rezoning requests. 2. Delay/postpone rezoning. 3. Less offensive rezoning. 4. Bluefield & River Roads as boundaries. 5. Combination of the above. Mrs. Hoffman: Against the rezoning; has water drainage problem. Commissioner Murdock: Inquired about the residents of the area; inquired who was present that joined the area. Marian Galliher: Joins Paul Lambert. Has deed restrictions on her lot. Is against the rezoning. Mrs. Huffman: Against. Steve Rutherford: Against. Norma Deck: Against. Terry Carr: Against. Mr. Walter Jones: Representing the owner, Mr. Lambert, spoke in favor of the project. Jerry Lundy: Answered a question about buffering. He said there were several methods of buffering that the owner could choose from. Mr. Dry: Against. Said the water and sewer were at I-77 & 150; not at this site. No other persons spoke for or against the rezoning request. HAROLD KISTLER, CASE 0587-5. Mr. Lundy identified this property on the zoning map. The request is to rezone property located on SR 1474, Bluefield Road, off NC 150 near I-77, from RA to GB(CUD). Proposed use is any or all uses in GB District. The planning board recommended approval on a 7-1 vote. Mr. Lundy said the Conditional Use was placed on the rezoning request by the planning depart- ment because of the condition of sufficient right-of-way to be dedicated for the proposed road leading to NC 150 depicted on the sketch submitted. Communication with the Department of Transpor- tation has revealed that this conditional use will not be necesssary and can be omitted from the request for rezoning. The same argument listed above was to apply to this zoning also. No other persons spoke for or against the rezoning request. 1 BOBBY AND SYLVIA HAROLD, CASE 0587-7. Mr. Lundy identified this property on the zoning map. The property is located on SR 1474, Bluefield Road, off NC 150, near I-77. They owners propose to use the property for any or all uses listed under the GB District use, and are requesting that the property be rezoned from RA to GB(CUD). Mr. Lundy said the Conditional Use District was placed on this case because of the condition that a sufficient right-of-way be dedicated for the proposed road leading to NC 150. This situation has been worked out with the Department of Transportation, and it will not be necessary to place the Conditional Use on the rezoning. The same argument listed above was to apply to this rezoning request. Mr. Jones, attorney representing these owners, said the property is continguous to the property already zoned. Commissioner Crosswhite inquired about a shopping center that is planned to build near this property. Commissioner Stewart: Inquired about access road to the property. Mr. Drye: Inquired how much of the property is continguous with the previously zoned property. No other persons spoke for or against this rezoning request. ROMAC METALS, INC. CASE 0587-4. Mr. Paul Haughton was represented by Mr. John Massey, attor-