Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutC.054.93008_14591U 1'1' recommendation of the planning board and rezone property from GB(CUD) to GB(CUD), conditional use is that property is subject to additional buffering (approximately 130') along Lot 26 of Spring Acres, Section II. That buffering should consist of the existing woodland at least 30' in width. This -^ property is located on NC Highway 150W, near the Apple House, more specifically described as Iredell County Tax Map 2N, Lot 19, Block A. VOTING: Ayes - 5; Nays - 0. REZONING - TROY T. MILLER, CASE #8808-1: MOTION from Commissioner Stewart to accept the recommendation of the planning board and rezone this property from RA to HB. The property is located along US Highway 21S, near SR 1135, Waterlynn Road, and is more specifically described as Iredell County Tax Map 2H -5-A-151 & 151A. VOTING: Ayes - 5; Nays - 0. REZONING - LAKE NORMAN YACHT CLUB, CASE #8808-2: MOTION from Commissioner Stewart to accept the recommendation of the planning board and rezone this property from R-20 to RR. This property is located on SR 1101, Wally Road, and SR 1182, Yacht Road, consisting of a portion of the water surface adjacent to Lot 5, Block C, of Iredell County Tax Map 2C. VOTING: Ayes - 5; Nays - 0. REZONING - CRESCENT LAND & TIMBER COMPANY, CASE #8808-3: MOTION from Commissioner Murdock to approve the request for rezoning from Crescent Land & Timber Corporation, to rezone this property from HB(CUD) back to RA. This property is located on SR 1205, Mecklynn Road, along I-77, more specifically described as Iredell County Tax Map 2A, Lot 22, Block A. REZONING - SARA S. & ROBERT STUTTS PROPERTY, CASE #8808-4: MOTION from Commissioner Murdock to approve the rezoning request from Sara S. & Robert Stotts, and rezone this property from RA to GB(CUD). This property is more specifically described as Iredell County tax Map 2Q, Lot 11, Block B, located along SR 1116, Talbert Road, near intersection of NC 150. AMENDMENT TO MOTION from Commissioner Murdock to include Exhibit 1 as a part of this approval. (Exhibit 1 to be on file in the Office of the Clerk to the Board, marked "STUTTS, ROBERT & SARA S., EXHIBIT 1 to 9/06/88 REZONING." VOTING ON MOTION AND AMENDMENT: Ayes - 5; Nays - 0. HOTEL/MOTEL TAX DISCUSSION AND BOARD ACTION: Discussion of the captioned matter was continued from the August 16, 1988, when a tie vote occurred when only four of the five commissioners were present. (See Minute Book III, p. 1006.) Commissioner Murdock said she made a motion at the August 16th meeting, and she would like to put that motion back on the floor at this time. The following is the motion placed back on the floor: MOTION from Commissioner Murdock to concur with the City of Statesville in the amendment of Paragraph #4 of the Contract between Iredell County and City of Statesville, pertaining to the disposition of funds from the hotel motel tax, and provide $20,000 of the proceeds collected to the present date and ten per cent of the future proceeds to be used for Travel and Tourism. This is for a two-year period, at the end of which the program would be reviewed. The budget for this program would be under the control of the Statesville City Council. Mr. Bill Long, representing Community Development at the Chamber of Commerce, was present to discuss this matter with the board. Chairman Hedrick said that after looking at the agreement it is understood that there would be no disposition of the money until the civic center is constructed; and if the civic center is not constructed, there would be a disposition of those funds collected to that time, 50% to the States- ville City Council and 50% to the Iredell County Commissioners. In reviewing that, Mr. Hedrick said he did not see any time frame the City Council would have to start or complete the civic center. I think it was an error not to include a time frame in the contract, he said. In further discussion, he said it seems to him that the County would be ahead regardless of which way the the money was spent, either for travel and tourism or for the civic center. Commissioner Stewart asked how it could be determined if the money is spent effectively. Commissioner Murdock suggested that some of the hotels and restaurants might want to advertise in the brochures, which would help offset the cost. Commissioner Crosswhite read a prepared statement explaining her position against amending the contract. Commissioner Stewart said she had inquired about a time frame at the time the county entered into the agreement. The reply was that these details had not been worked out at that time, but were forthcoming. Commissioner Crosswhite said it was projected at that time to be two years before they could break ground. Chairman Hedrick explained the reconstruction of the Bill that allowed the collection of the Occupancy Tax. He said he believed the contract between the County and City could be changed. 0